Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01210
Original file (MD04-01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01210

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040723. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041222. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “I feel that I have changed and can be a great help to the military. When I first joined I was young and married was missing home. Now that I’ve been out of the service I’ve realized that it was the best thing that happened to me. So I ask that you’ll take my upgrade into great consideration.”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None             
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990609               Date of Discharge: 020621

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 08 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 48

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 3521

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.0 (*)                       Conduct: 3.8 (*)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, RMB

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 72

* Proficiency and Conduct marks extracted from SJA Letter, 13 Jul 02.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

991025:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Your unsatisfactory conduct as evidenced by your unauthorized absence from your unit on or about 2146, on 991004 to on or about 1650, on 991010. This behavior is unsatisfactory and will not be tolerated. Accountability is paramount to the Marine Corps mission. You can not just come and go as you please. This conduct is unbecoming of a Marine and does not conform to the good order and discipline of the Marine Corps. ] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

991013:  Applicant to UA (AWOL) since 2146, 991004.

991014:  Applicant from UA (AWOL) at 1650, 991010.

 991026:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (1 spec):
 Specification 1: UA from H&Sco, MCCSSS, MCB CamLej, 2146, 991004 to 1650, 991010.
Awarded 30 days restriction to the limits of LOScol, MCCSSS, MCB CamLej without suspension from duty, 30 days extra duty to run concurrently. Not appealed.
000620:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Specifically for failure to obey Marine Corps orders and regulations. This will not be tolerated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
000710:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (1 spec):
 Specification 1: UA (AWOL) Did, absent himself from his organization from, 1200 on 000530 and did remain so absent until, 2359 on 000601.
Awarded forfeiture $263.00 pay per month for 1 month (total forfeiture $263.00), 14 days restriction to the limits of Engineer Support Company, 8 th EngrSptBn, 2d FSSG without suspension from duty and 14 days extra duties to run concurrently. Forfeiture of $263.00 pay per month for 1 month, 14 days restriction and 14 days extra duties suspended for 3 months, at which time, unless sooner vacated, will be remitted without further action. (Total forfeiture suspended $263.00). Not appealed.
010822:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (1 spec):
 Specification 1: UA (AWOL) from 0700, 010706 to 0700, 010709 without proper authority absence himself from his appointed place of duty.
Awarded reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $584.00 pay per month for 2 months (Total forfeiture $1168.00), and 60 days restricted to the limits of 8thESBn, 2dFSSG without suspension from duty. Effective date of reduction is 010807. Forfeiture of $584.00 pay per month for 1 month suspended for 3 months, at which time, unless sooner vacated , the suspended forfeiture will be remitted without further action (Total forfeiture suspended $1168.00). Not appealed.

010827:  Applicant to UA (AWOL) since 0200, 000530.

010827:  Applicant from UA (AWOL) at 0700, 000601.

020514:  NJP for violations of UCMJ, Article 121, 86, 92, 134:
 Violation of UCMJ Article 121 (1spec):
Specification 1: On or about 1630, 0200326 SNM stole 2 compact disc, the property of the main exchange.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs):
Specification 1: UA (AWOL) 0600, 010930
Specification 2: UA (AWOL) 0600, 011126 to 0950, 011226
Specification 3: UA (AWOL) 0500, 020119
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (3 specs):
Specification 1: On or about 011028 failed to obey a lawful order.
Specification 2: On or about 0500, 011028 violate BO P5560.2K.
Specification 3: On or about 0500, 011028 fail to do the same by driving his vehicle off base.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (1spec):
Specification 1: On or about 011028 at barracks FC-550 SNM breaks his restriction.
Awarded reduction to E-1, forfeiture $257.00 pay per month for 2 months (Total forfeiture $514.00), 45 days restriction to the limits of 2d MaintBn, 2dFSSG without suspension from duty, and 45 days extra duties, to run concurrently. Forfeiture of $257.00 pay per month for 2 months suspended for 6 months, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended forfeiture will be remitted without further action (Total forfeiture suspended $514.00). Not appealed.
020606:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Pattern of misconduct.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
020611:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by your [Applicant] 2 adverse page 11’s, 4 NJPs, and subsequent misconduct as documented by a charge sheet dated 4 June 2002.
.
020611:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.


020611:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was based upon his [Applicant’s] 2 adverse page 11’s, 4 NJPs, and subsequent misconduct as documented by a charge sheet dated 4 June 2002.

020713:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

Not Dated:       GCMCA, Commander, 2d Force Service Support Group, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020621under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant contends that his problems in the Marine Corps can be attributed to being young, married and homesick. While he may feel that these factors were the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The Applicant’s service was marred by 4 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (UA for a total of 72 days), 92, 121, and 134 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.




Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00945

    Original file (MD04-00945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00945 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040517. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: None submitted PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 871123- 880719 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880720 Date of Discharge: 920409 Length of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00503

    Original file (ND04-00503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D_ N_ (Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880725 Date of Discharge: 900424 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 01 08 29 Inactive: 00 04 22 Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 8...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00510

    Original file (ND00-00510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.910901: [USS MOUNT WHITNEY (LCC-20)] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct an misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense [EXTRACTED FROM CO'S MESSAGE]. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 911220 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01067

    Original file (MD99-01067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 32 months of service with no other adverse action. Not appealed.871109: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions.871112: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01125

    Original file (ND02-01125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990424 - 990527 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 990528 Date of Discharge: 011105 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 05 08 Inactive: None 011028: Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00700

    Original file (ND04-00700.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 011212 - 020107 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 020108 Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00875

    Original file (MD99-00875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00875 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990609, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions, that the RE code be upgraded, and the reason for the discharge be changed to convenience of the government. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500300

    Original file (ND0500300.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 020206: Applicant completed two weeks of outpatient alcohol rehabilitation treatment at SARD aboard USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN 72).Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (CO’s NJP of 020201 for VUCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence (3 specs); Article 91, disrespect in language; Article 134, drunk and disorderly. The names, and votes of the members...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601125

    Original file (MD0601125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20010501: Applicant from unauthorized absence 0800 (surrendered).20010806: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 0730, 20010301 to 0123, 20010502, Award: Forfeiture of $584.00 for 2 months, extra duty for 45 days. UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS (20020808) SJA review (date): (20020814)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP (20020816)Narrative Reason directed: MISCONDUCT DUE TO A Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00184

    Original file (ND99-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00184 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981118, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 840309 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct pattern frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities (A). After a thorough review of the...